2 3/4 chamber stamping

NO ITEMS MAY BE POSTED FOR SALE ON THIS FORUM or direct references to items for sale. This includes, but is not limited to, the following: A personal item that’s obviously for sale or would appear to be for sale; or if a link is posted to some other site where the item is for sale. Please note that references to items posted elsewhere are ok for discussion as long as a direct link is not included. Any "Wanted to Buy" posts are not allowed and will be removed. The moderators will delete any posts that are deemed offensive, abusive or slanderous in nature. Commercial operations or businesses may not advertise nor appear to advertise their products or services, either directly, or indirectly by a second party, except for simple reference as a source for such products or services
Post Reply
trkline
Posts: 16
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 8:56 am
Location: Claverack, NY

2 3/4 chamber stamping

Post by trkline »

The following picture is of a 16 ga. Sterlingworth's barrel flat. It is a Philly gun from 1914. Does this look like stamping performed later by Savage - perhaps the gun was returned for repair and Savage extended the chambers?

Thanks very much, in advance, for any help/thoughts.

T.R.
Image
DGKaas
Posts: 201
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 7:28 pm
Location: Philadelphia

Post by DGKaas »

No, it does not look like a Savage mark to me. Savage usually added 2 3/4" marking on the exterior of the barrel of early guns sent for repair, etc. Dave Noreen would know best.
trkline
Posts: 16
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 8:56 am
Location: Claverack, NY

Post by trkline »

Thanks very much, Mr. Kaas. Yes, I have seen the exterior stamping. Was hopeful that this was an early Savage stamp or that current owner resisted the exterior stamping. If it is simply an after market stamp - then it was just done as a reminder to the user? Thanks,

T.R.
vaturkey
Posts: 3579
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2008 6:33 pm
Location: Hamilton, VA
Has thanked: 1015 times
Been thanked: 1457 times

I've seen this once before

Post by vaturkey »

Interestingly enough it was also a 16 gauge SW and on the water table. Looked the same as this one.
trkline
Posts: 16
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 8:56 am
Location: Claverack, NY

Post by trkline »

I'm sorry, I don't understand. Are you saying you've seen the same stamping on the watertable of a 16 ga? Is that just the "16 ga" stamp?

Thanks,

T.R.
mike campbell
Posts: 385
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 3:29 pm

Post by mike campbell »

I have an early Utica gun that is stamped 16ga on the watertable (a bit neater than yours :) ), but nothing about the chambers or gauge on the barrel flats.

My Philly 20ga's are not stamped with the gauge.
Beware the man with one gun...he likely will bore you to death in others ways, too.
trkline
Posts: 16
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 8:56 am
Location: Claverack, NY

Post by trkline »

Thanks, Mike. Well, I had hoped it might be Savage, but I guess I have my answer. I can't imagine why anyone would go to the trouble to stamp the barrel flats? Neater? Yes, well, I guess it must have been past quitting time and the rush was on.

Thanks, all.
mc15426378
Posts: 739
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2008 11:23 pm
Location: Mississippi

Post by mc15426378 »

My 16 ga A philly gun also has no gauge marking on the watertable.

Mike
vaturkey
Posts: 3579
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2008 6:33 pm
Location: Hamilton, VA
Has thanked: 1015 times
Been thanked: 1457 times

Sorry I wasn't clear

Post by vaturkey »

trkline wrote:I'm sorry, I don't understand. Are you saying you've seen the same stamping on the watertable of a 16 ga? Is that just the "16 ga" stamp?

Thanks,

T.R.
I've seen the 2 3/4 stamped on the water table and I've seen the 16 Ga stamped on the watertable. Those were two different guns. The 16 gauge with the 2 3/4" on the watertable was a Philly SW 16 and had 30 inch barrels. It also had a replacement but original buttstock (the Uttica late ugly kind). My guess was the gun was sent back for restocking to Uttica and at the same time had the chambers lengthened. Maybe the owner didn't want 2 3/4 stamped on the barrel.
trkline
Posts: 16
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 8:56 am
Location: Claverack, NY

Post by trkline »

Thanks, VA.

That was what I was hoping and makes more sense to stamp the flats than the water table. I certainly would prefer the barrel flats to the barrel exterior myself. I guess there is no concrete answer, but I appreciate all the responses very much.

T.R.
eightbore
Posts: 3259
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 5:12 pm
Has thanked: 83 times
Been thanked: 406 times

Post by eightbore »

He probably had a 6 stamp, but it was upside down and he thought it was a 9.
Post Reply