Since wishing doesn't cost anything .........
-
Stan Hillis
- Posts: 2826
- Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 8:31 pm
- Location: Jawja
- Has thanked: 880 times
- Been thanked: 1002 times
Since wishing doesn't cost anything .........
I wish that Ansley, or the Godschalks, had seen fit to produce a .410 Sterlingworth. I understand why they didn't. Going into the gun business bucking a headwind, like Ansley did, was tough enough without having to come up with the tooling to produce another scaled frame gauge gun. But, just think how sweet a 28-30" barreled .410 Sterly Ejector would be. Having the "littlegunitis" like I do, I can just picture it in my mind. My illness hasn't reached Stage 4 yet, and caused me to consider a CSMC Fox .410, but it does cause me considerable consternation, on the long afternoons on a tractor, daydreaming about "what might have been". I've even had a dream that I had one.
Just tell me straight out, how bad is it, Doc?
Just tell me straight out, how bad is it, Doc?
-
44whiskey
- Posts: 1062
- Joined: Sun Dec 13, 2020 11:48 am
- Location: theater district cut n shoot texas
- Has thanked: 2526 times
- Been thanked: 257 times
Re: Since wishing doesn't cost anything .........
it must be contagious, i have a touch of it too,
all the best 44whiskey. ps CSMC 410 above my pay grade at present. double ps i would like to shoulder one of the belgium folding double hammer guns. i think i would like that if i could find one in good condition.
-
Researcher
- Posts: 6247
- Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 7:18 pm
- Location: WA/AK
- Has thanked: 481 times
- Been thanked: 2492 times
Re: Since wishing doesn't cost anything .........
I find that most of the vintage .410-bores are very hard to shoot well. They have way too much of their weight "between the hands" with those tiny whippy barrels out front. Adding to the "between the hands" weight is the heavy breech ends of the barrels to fit the too large frames they are built on. Most I'm familiar with are in the 5 3/4 pound weight with 26-inch barrels. Tony built a really tiny frame for his RBL-410. My RBL weighs a fraction of an ounce over five pounds and with its 28-inch barrels has much better handling dynamics.
I have never had the opportunity to handle one of the .410-bore Ansley H. Fox doubles Tony has built. With a weight of just over six pounds with 26-inch barrels, I'd guess the .410-bore Ansley H. Fox by Tony that is currently listed on GI is on the regular frame --
I have never had the opportunity to handle one of the .410-bore Ansley H. Fox doubles Tony has built. With a weight of just over six pounds with 26-inch barrels, I'd guess the .410-bore Ansley H. Fox by Tony that is currently listed on GI is on the regular frame --
Share the knowledge
-
DarylC
- Posts: 1643
- Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 11:04 am
- Location: People's Republic of Maryland
- Has thanked: 2246 times
- Been thanked: 776 times
Re: Since wishing doesn't cost anything .........
I've always thought a 28ga. on the existing 20ga. frame would be the cats pajamas Stan. The 20ga frame on a Fox is same size as the OO frame Parker. Just imagine a 32" Fox 28, straight grip with the longer forend.
Owning a Fox is not a spectator sport.
-
Stan Hillis
- Posts: 2826
- Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 8:31 pm
- Location: Jawja
- Has thanked: 880 times
- Been thanked: 1002 times
Re: Since wishing doesn't cost anything .........
Just imagine a scaled frame .410 being two sizes down from the petite 20 ga. Fox frame. It would be tiny! I have two other makes of .410 S X S that are on gauge specific frames, and they are so lovely. But, no one ever built a box lock frame with the beautiful sculpting of a Fox. Oh well, it costs me nothing to dream.
-
Researcher
- Posts: 6247
- Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 7:18 pm
- Location: WA/AK
- Has thanked: 481 times
- Been thanked: 2492 times
Re: Since wishing doesn't cost anything .........
Tony did build the really tiny Ansley H. Fox frame for the .22 LR double rifles
Share the knowledge
-
Stan Hillis
- Posts: 2826
- Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 8:31 pm
- Location: Jawja
- Has thanked: 880 times
- Been thanked: 1002 times
- fox-admin
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4158
- Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2007 4:46 pm
- Has thanked: 770 times
- Been thanked: 2150 times
Re: Since wishing doesn't cost anything .........
Interesting topic, Daryl your dream gun would be a holy grail gun in today's market, I can't imagine the auction competition for such a gun.
My dream gun exists 31736 a CE Super Fox with ducks engraved on the action, I wish they were all made that way.
My dream gun exists 31736 a CE Super Fox with ducks engraved on the action, I wish they were all made that way.
-
Stan Hillis
- Posts: 2826
- Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2008 8:31 pm
- Location: Jawja
- Has thanked: 880 times
- Been thanked: 1002 times
Re: Since wishing doesn't cost anything .........
When some distant uncle passes and leaves me rolling in it I'll commission one to be built. I'm not counting on the lottery because I don't play it. Farming is gambling enough for me.
-
eightbore
- Posts: 3304
- Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 5:12 pm
- Has thanked: 89 times
- Been thanked: 440 times
Re: Since wishing doesn't cost anything .........
I'm not sure that the .22 rifle frame that Tony builds would not accept a set of .410 barrels. Even if it is too small between the pins, a slight modification may make it acceptable for .410 barrels. However, many long barrel .410 and 28 gauge guns have been built on CSMC small frames and are perfectly acceptable guns with good handling qualities. An Iver Johnson Skeeter would also make a good handling .410 with long barrels.
-
Researcher
- Posts: 6247
- Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 7:18 pm
- Location: WA/AK
- Has thanked: 481 times
- Been thanked: 2492 times
Re: Since wishing doesn't cost anything .........
There are those Parker 32-inch BHE .410-bores out there somewhere.
Share the knowledge